Happiness is Simple (1)

Is happiness truly simple? That depends on whom you ask.

For some, happiness lies in a warm cup of tea, a quiet moment with a book, or a child’s laughter. In that sense, happiness is indeed simple—found in fleeting, everyday moments. It costs nothing, asks for little, and gives much.

But for others, happiness is entangled with security, justice, purpose, and dignity. It becomes a complex equation involving income, relationships, mental health, and social recognition. For them, to say "happiness is simple" might sound dismissive or naïve.

So yes, happiness can be simple, but only when basic needs are met and the heart has room to breathe. In a world of inequality, struggle, and performance pressure, simplicity itself might be a luxury.

From a philosophical standpoint, happiness has long been treated as the highest good and the ultimate purpose of human existence. Aristotle, in Nicomachean Ethics (4th century BC, multiple translations; Penguin Classics 2004), defined happiness — or eudaimonia — as the flourishing of the soul achieved through virtue and rational activity. Similarly, Epicurus believed that happiness rested in the cultivation of tranquillity and freedom from fear, not in endless pleasure. In modern times, Jonathan Haidt’s The Happiness Hypothesis (2006, Basic Books) blends ancient wisdom with contemporary psychology, suggesting that happiness comes when meaning, virtue, and emotional balance are aligned.

Jonathan Haidt approaches the subject of happiness not as a preacher of a single doctrine but as a curious scholar who sees wisdom as a tapestry woven across cultures and centuries. In The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom, he draws from the allegories of Plato, the teachings of the Buddha, and the moral vision of Jesus, yet he does not simply quote them as authorities; rather, he subjects their claims to the scrutiny of psychology and neuroscience. For instance, Plato’s metaphor of the divided self—the charioteer guiding two horses—becomes for Haidt a lens through which modern research on the emotional and rational brain can be understood. Similarly, the Buddhist idea that desire is the root of suffering is explored not as a mystical statement but as an insight echoed by behavioural studies on hedonic adaptation and the fleeting satisfaction of consumerism. When Haidt invokes Jesus, it is not to preach salvation but to examine the transformative power of compassion, forgiveness, and love, themes that find resonance in contemporary findings on positive psychology and pro-social behaviour. In weaving these strands together, Haidt suggests that happiness and meaning are not discovered in the rejection of either ancient wisdom or modern science, but in their dialogue—where timeless intuitions meet empirical evidence, and where philosophy and psychology can illuminate one another.

Let’s take one of Haidt’s most striking examples where he revives Aristotle’s notion of eudaimonia—the idea that true happiness is not about fleeting pleasures but about living a life of virtue and purpose. Haidt explains that Aristotle believed a flourishing life could only emerge when people cultivate virtues like courage, generosity, and temperance, thereby aligning their character with what is noble and meaningful. Instead of treating this as dusty philosophy, Haidt turns to modern psychology, especially Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s research on flow, that state in which a person becomes so absorbed in an activity that time seems to dissolve. He argues that Aristotle’s vision of a virtuous life corresponds to a modern scientific understanding of happiness: it is not about chasing rewards or escaping pain, but about engaging in activities that stretch one’s abilities, foster growth, and connect the self to something larger. By linking Aristotle’s wisdom with empirical studies of flow, Haidt demonstrates that the ancients were not merely moralising; they were sketching psychological truths that science now verifies in laboratories and surveys.

HHaidt explores the paradox that lies at the heart of modern life: while people tirelessly chase after money, success, and pleasures, these pursuits often leave them no happier than before. He begins by unpacking the psychological concept of the “happiness set point,” suggesting that much of our sense of well-being is influenced by genetics and temperament, which explains why external changes—such as getting a new job, earning more money, or moving to a nicer home—tend to give only a temporary boost. To illustrate this, Haidt draws upon research into the hedonic treadmill, the idea that people quickly adapt to improvements or declines in their circumstances, returning to a relatively stable baseline of happiness.

Haidt does not stop with this sobering picture; instead, he insists that the ancient teachers were not wrong in claiming that happiness comes from within, but their message must be refined through scientific evidence. He notes that while wealth beyond a certain threshold adds little to happiness, strong social bonds, meaningful work, and a sense of purpose do make a lasting difference. In dialogue with Buddha’s warning against attachment, Haidt points out that modern psychology confirms the fleeting nature of pleasure-seeking, yet it also reveals that the pursuit of love, engagement, and service to others can create more sustainable joy. Thus, Haidt reframes the “pursuit of happiness” not as a consumerist race but as a quest for balance—between external achievements and inner cultivation, between desire and discipline, between what ancient wisdom intuited and what modern science now demonstrates.

In the chapter Happiness Comes from Between of his book, Jonathan Haidt makes one of his central arguments: that happiness is not found solely within the individual, nor is it simply given by external possessions, but rather it emerges in the spaces “between” people, activities, and ideas. He begins by challenging the popular notion that happiness is entirely an inner state that can be cultivated in isolation through meditation or positive thinking. Instead, he argues that our sense of meaning and joy is profoundly relational: it comes from being connected to others, engaged in purposeful work, and linked to something larger than the self.

Haidt uses the metaphor of the self as a rider on an elephant to show that both reason and emotion must cooperate with the social environment. Relationships, love, and community are depicted not as accessories to life but as its very substance. He points out that scientific research in psychology repeatedly confirms this: people who have strong social ties, who participate in communities, and who commit themselves to causes beyond mere self-interest consistently report higher levels of life satisfaction. In this sense, Haidt integrates Aristotle’s claim that virtue and flourishing come through practice within society, the Buddha’s recognition of interconnectedness, and Jesus’s emphasis on love and service.

Ultimately, the chapter argues that happiness is “between” in three crucial dimensions: between ourselves and other people (through love, friendship, and social bonds), between ourselves and our work (through engagement and flow), and between ourselves and something larger than us (through spirituality, morality, or service). Haidt’s insight is that the good life is not simply about adjusting the mind but about weaving one’s life into a network of meaningful connections, where the individual becomes most fully alive not in isolation but in relation.

Haidt brings together the threads of philosophy, psychology, and science to argue that the secret to happiness lies not in choosing one extreme over another, but in learning how to live in balance. He reflects on the many contrasts explored throughout the book—reason and emotion, self and others, ancient wisdom and modern science, individual desires and collective duties—and suggests that a flourishing life is one in which these dualities are not fought against but harmonised. For Haidt, balance is not a static state but a dynamic practice, like riding a bicycle: it requires constant adjustment, awareness, and effort.

He concludes that happiness is best found when we stop searching for a single formula and instead learn how to live between competing truths. Ancient sages were right in insisting that the good life requires virtue, discipline, and connection, but modern psychology also reveals that pleasure, positive emotion, and individual fulfilment matter deeply. To ignore either side is to limp through life on one leg. By embracing balance—between work and love, giving and receiving, striving and accepting—we create conditions in which both the rider and the elephant, both reason and passion, can move together in harmony. Haidt’s closing message is therefore one of humility and integration: happiness does not come from a single source, nor can it be seized by force; it is cultivated slowly, in balance, as we weave ourselves into the fabric of relationships, communities, and ideals larger than the self.

Viewed through an economic lens, happiness is often measured in relation to wealth, consumption, and well-being. Richard Layard, in Happiness: Lessons from a New Science (2005, Penguin Books), argues that beyond a certain level of income, money does not guarantee greater happiness. Instead, inequality, unemployment, and lack of purpose erode well-being, while social trust and mental health are stronger predictors of lasting contentment. Happiness in economics is thus linked less to accumulation and more to sustainable conditions that support human dignity.

In Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, Richard Layard presents happiness not merely as a fleeting emotional state but as the central goal of human life that can and should be studied with the same seriousness as economics or politics. He argues that happiness is best understood as a combination of positive feelings and the absence of pain, a subjective well-being that people themselves can report. Drawing on psychology, neuroscience, and social science, Layard insists that happiness is not only an individual pursuit but also a social responsibility, since the conditions in which people live—such as income, employment, relationships, and community—play a decisive role. Crucially, he points out that beyond a certain threshold, increases in wealth do not necessarily lead to increases in happiness, because human beings adapt quickly and constantly compare themselves to others. Instead, Layard concludes that trust, fairness, mental health, and strong personal relationships matter far more for lasting happiness. In this sense, he redefines happiness as something both deeply personal and inherently collective, a measure of the health of society itself.

Layard pushes his argument further by linking happiness directly to public policy, suggesting that governments should not only measure economic growth but also track the well-being of their citizens as a central goal. He criticises the obsession with Gross Domestic Product as the ultimate measure of success, because while GDP may rise, people do not necessarily become happier. Instead, Layard proposes that policymakers should prioritise mental health services, education that fosters emotional resilience, and labour markets that provide both security and meaning. He stresses that reducing inequality is vital, since relative deprivation fuels unhappiness when people constantly compare themselves with others. In his view, happiness science should be used to design societies where trust, cooperation, and fairness are embedded, making well-being a collective achievement rather than a by-product of unchecked economic growth. Layard thus reimagines politics not just as the management of resources, but as the art of creating conditions in which people can flourish emotionally and socially.

Layard delivers a sharp criticism of consumerism, arguing that the relentless pursuit of material goods creates an endless treadmill where people are never satisfied. He points out that consumer culture encourages individuals to define their worth by possessions, status symbols, and constant comparison with others, yet these external markers provide only temporary pleasure before fading into normality. This phenomenon, often called the "hedonic treadmill," means that people keep running after more without ever arriving at lasting happiness. Layard insists that this cycle not only exhausts individuals but also damages society, since it fuels competition rather than cooperation and erodes values of trust and solidarity. He therefore calls for a cultural shift away from measuring life by what we buy, towards valuing relationships, community, and meaningful work. In this way, Layard reframes happiness as something undermined by consumerism, and only recoverable when societies place human connection above material accumulation.

Layard moves from diagnosis to remedy, offering what could be called social and personal “life-hacks” grounded in science. He argues that instead of chasing wealth and status, societies should focus on policies that nurture the real foundations of well-being: mental health, family stability, meaningful work, and community cohesion. On an individual level, he highlights practices such as gratitude, generosity, and cultivating strong personal relationships as far more reliable routes to happiness than buying more possessions. At the collective level, Layard insists that governments should treat mental health with the same seriousness as physical health, ensuring access to therapy and support. He also advocates for progressive taxation and policies that reduce inequality, since fairness increases trust and overall well-being. By promoting education that builds emotional resilience rather than just academic success, he hopes to prepare future generations for balanced lives. In essence, Layard’s “recipe” for happiness is to replace the shallow rewards of consumerism with deep, sustainable sources of fulfilment rooted in connection, fairness, and inner stability.

The book The Origins of Happiness: The Science of Well-Being over the Life Course (2018, Princeton University Press) by Andrew E. Clark, Sarah Flèche, Richard Layard, Nattavudh Powdthavee, and George Ward is an ambitious attempt to shift the study of human welfare away from the narrow measures of income and consumption that dominate economics, towards a more holistic understanding of well-being. Drawing on large-scale longitudinal datasets from Britain, the United States, Germany and Australia, the authors explore the determinants of happiness across different stages of life, showing that mental health, relationships, and stable employment exert far greater influence on life satisfaction than income growth alone. Their central argument is that governments and policymakers should no longer treat Gross Domestic Product as the ultimate yardstick of progress, but should instead design policies that prioritise mental well-being and emotional stability as core objectives. The book reveals, for instance, that childhood experiences, educational environments, and early family structures leave long shadows that significantly shape levels of happiness later in adulthood, meaning that interventions in these areas can have enduring positive effects. It also argues that while material security is important to a certain threshold, its marginal returns to happiness quickly diminish, whereas social bonds, trust, and psychological resilience remain vital throughout the life course. In this way, the book not only contributes to the growing field of happiness economics but also poses a provocative challenge to the way modern societies conceptualise success, urging a shift towards policies that actively foster human flourishing.

In Chapter 16, The Origin of Happiness, the authors bring together the evidence gathered throughout the book and present a decisive conclusion: happiness is not primarily a function of material wealth, but rather of social and psychological conditions that shape human life from childhood to old age. They emphasise that mental health emerges as the single most powerful predictor of well-being, outweighing factors such as income, physical health, or even employment status. Alongside this, the quality of personal relationships and the experience of love, trust, and social support consistently dominate as determinants of happiness. The chapter also highlights how early childhood experiences and education leave a lasting imprint, meaning that interventions in the earliest years of life offer the highest potential returns in terms of long-term well-being. The authors argue that since governments already invest vast resources into policies designed to raise GDP, there is no reason why comparable effort should not be directed towards promoting mental health, strengthening family life, and fostering secure social environments. Their ultimate conclusion is that the “origin of happiness” lies less in economic growth and more in policies and practices that nurture mental resilience, relational stability, and opportunities for meaning across the life course.

The conclusion directly challenges the supremacy of Gross Domestic Product as the universal measure of progress by showing that economic growth does not guarantee sustained improvements in well-being. The authors argue that while GDP reflects the volume of goods and services produced, it tells us very little about whether individuals live meaningful, fulfilling, and contented lives. Their data demonstrate that beyond a modest threshold of material security, the gains from additional income quickly flatten, leaving mental health, relationships, and social trust as the true drivers of happiness. By making this case, the book exposes the narrowness of policy agendas that obsess over economic growth while neglecting the human experience behind the numbers. It urges governments to embrace well-being as an explicit objective, measuring progress through indicators that capture mental stability, quality of relationships, and opportunities for purposeful living. 

A policy agenda driven by GDP is akin to a race in which the sole goal is speed: it prompts societies to produce and consume more, often regardless of whether this increased activity actually improves people’s lives. In this model, success is measured in raw output—factories churning, markets expanding, and incomes climbing—even if the mental strain, social disconnection, or environmental cost is quietly mounting in the background. By contrast, a policy agenda driven by well-being shifts the entire compass. Instead of asking, “How fast are we growing?” it asks, “Are people actually flourishing?” Here, mental health services are valued as much as highways, social trust is seen as infrastructure as vital as electricity, and childhood care is treated as an investment every bit as strategic as building a new airport. The difference lies in what societies consider the endpoint of progress: one treats humans as cogs fuelling an economic machine, while the other recognises humans as the very purpose of that machine. Such a contrast reveals that the pursuit of well-being is not an indulgence but a redefinition of prosperity itself, aligning public policy with the real textures of human happiness.

Chasing GDP is rather like chasing “likes” on social media: the numbers may climb, the graphs may look impressive, and at first there is a thrill in watching the count tick upwards. Yet the glow fades quickly, leaving people hungry for the next surge, often without any deeper sense of fulfilment. By contrast, a society that prioritises well-being is like someone who has one or two genuine friends: the quantity may not dazzle, but the quality provides a steady sense of trust, support, and belonging that endures long after the numbers are forgotten. The analogy captures the essential difference between an obsession with surface-level growth and a commitment to deeper human flourishing. One model makes progress a performance, measured in digits that can be flaunted; the other makes progress a lived experience, grounded in mental stability, meaningful relationships, and the quiet confidence of knowing life is heading somewhere worthwhile.

In essence, the authors suggest that the pursuit of happiness should not be seen as a private luxury but as a legitimate public goal, every bit as worthy of state investment as roads, schools, or defence. Such a perspective implies a radical rethinking of what societies value and how success should be defined in the twenty-first century.

Wellbeing: Science and Policy (2023, Cambridge University Press) by Richard Layard and Jan-Emmanuel De Neve is a wide-ranging and rigorous attempt to place human happiness at the heart of public decision-making. Drawing on decades of research in psychology, neuroscience, and economics, the authors argue that well-being should not be dismissed as a vague or sentimental aspiration, but measured, studied, and systematically improved through public policy. They show how subjective well-being—people’s self-reported experiences of life satisfaction and emotional states—can be quantified with surprising reliability, providing a robust alternative to traditional economic indicators such as GDP. The book explores the many drivers of happiness, from mental and physical health to relationships, work, income, and community, and demonstrates that mental health interventions, education, and social trust often yield far greater improvements in life satisfaction than additional economic growth. At its core, the book is a manifesto for a new kind of politics: one that evaluates success not in terms of material expansion but in terms of how well societies allow their people to live fulfilling, meaningful, and joyful lives. By laying out both the science of measuring well-being and the policy tools available to governments, the authors invite readers to imagine a future in which human flourishing is not a by-product but the central aim of civilisation.

From a social perspective, happiness is deeply relational. Émile Durkheim’s Suicide (1897, The Free Press edition 1951) demonstrates that the strength of social bonds profoundly shapes human happiness and despair. More recently, Robert Putnam in Bowling Alone (2000, Simon & Schuster) shows how declining community ties in the United States led to weakened trust, increased loneliness, and a diminished sense of collective happiness. In this sense, happiness is not simply an individual feeling but a social fabric woven from belonging, participation, and solidarity.

Within a cultural frame, happiness is never a neutral concept but always shaped by values and traditions. In Denmark, Meik Wiking’s The Little Book of Hygge (2017, Penguin Life) illustrates how happiness is embedded in cultural practices of comfort, togetherness, and simplicity. In Bhutan, the philosophy of Gross National Happiness, described in Karma Ura’s The Introduction to Gross National Happiness (2009, The Centre for Bhutan Studies), frames happiness as a collective goal, prioritising spiritual and ecological well-being above GDP. Culture, therefore, transforms happiness into a shared ideal, one that reflects the deepest aspirations of a people.

Taken together, these perspectives show that happiness is not a singular emotion but a multifaceted condition. It is philosophical fulfilment, economic balance, social connection, and cultural expression, intertwined into the complex yet universal pursuit of the good life.

[Part 2]

Bahasa