[Fragment 3]"Sovereignty that prioritizes justice and fairness fosters stability and harmony, embodying a kind of moral beauty. The Magna Carta (1215) was an early acknowledgement of limiting sovereign power to ensure justice, showing the potential beauty of balanced authority," Nifty went on. "The Magna Carta ('The Great Charter') was a monumental document agreed upon in 1215 between King John of England and a group of rebellious barons. While primarily a practical response to political unrest, it has come to symbolize the principle of limiting sovereign power to ensure justice and protect individual rights. This balance of authority highlights the "beauty" of a just and accountable governance system.By 1215, King John’s arbitrary rule, heavy taxation, and failures in foreign wars (such as the loss of Normandy in 1204) led to widespread dissatisfaction among England’s barons. The barons, seeking to curtail royal authority, forced King John to accept a charter that would affirm their rights and impose checks on the king's power. The Magna Carta was initially intended to protect the feudal rights of the barons, but the document evolved into a broader assertion of the principle that sovereign power is not absolute.The Magna Carta established that even the king is subject to the law, rejecting the notion of unchecked sovereign power. While initially limited to barons and nobility, the charter introduced the idea that certain rights are inviolable and must be protected against sovereign overreach. The Magna Carta required that the king seek counsel from his barons before imposing taxes, recognising the principle of no taxation without representation. The charter sought to establish mechanisms for holding the sovereign accountable.The Magna Carta embodies balanced authority's potential "beauty" by reconciling power with justice. It demonstrates the moral and social harmony achieved when the rule of law and accountability tempers sovereign power. By rejecting absolute authority, the Magna Carta highlights that true sovereignty serves the people, ensuring fairness and protecting against oppression. Although rooted in feudal concerns, its principles—such as the rule of law and protection of rights—resonate with universal ideas of justice and human dignity. Over centuries, the Magna Carta has been celebrated as a foundational document in the development of constitutional governance. It inspired later milestones like the English Bill of Rights (1689) and the United States Constitution (1787).Power is a neutral force—it is neither inherently good nor evil. Its beauty or ugliness depends on how it is wielded. Friedrich Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and No One (translated by Walter Kaufmann. Penguin Classics, 1978) explores the concept of the "will to power," describing it as a driving force in human nature. While it can lead to greatness, it also has the potential for corruption if unchecked.Nietzsche portrays the "will to power" as the primary force underlying all human activity and existence. It represents the instinct to grow, assert oneself, and transcend limitations. The "will to power" is not about survival alone (as Darwinian natural selection might suggest) but about thriving and creating meaning. Nietzsche criticizes philosophies that prioritize mere existence or passive contentment, arguing that the essence of life is striving and self-overcoming, “Where I found the living, there I found will to power.”The "will to power" manifests as an individual's drive to surpass themselves, conquer personal limitations, and achieve higher states of being. Nietzsche's Übermensch (Overman or Superman) embodies this principle as a person who creates their values and lives beyond societal norms, “What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal; what can be loved in man is that he is an over-going (signifies a transcending or overcoming of existing limitations and values. It embodies Nietzsche's idea of the Übermensch (Overman or Superman), who creates his values and embodies a more affirmative approach to life. This concept encourages individuals to rise above societal constraints and embrace their instincts, passions, and creativity. Over-going represents the potential for transformation and the pursuit of greatness through self-overcoming.) and down-going (a process of descent or decline, often related to the rejection of established values, norms, and beliefs that Nietzsche viewed as life-denying or oppressive. This can involve a critical examination of traditional morality, religion, and societal structures that inhibit individual growth and creativity. Nietzsche often critiques the herd mentality and the moral systems that promote mediocrity and conformity.).”Unlike the will to survive or dominate, the "will to power" also entails a creative impulse. Humans, Nietzsche suggests, are driven to impose meaning, create art, innovate, and shape their reality, “This secret spake Life herself unto me: ‘Behold,’ said she, ‘I am that which must ever surpass itself.'"Nietzsche presents the 'will to power' as beautiful because it celebrates life’s dynamism, creativity, and inherent struggle. It elevates individuals who embrace self-overcoming and create values that resonate with their true nature. The 'will to power' provides a life-affirming alternative to nihilism, the belief that life lacks inherent meaning. By asserting their will, individuals can craft meaning and purpose. Nietzsche’s philosophy encourages individuals to rise above mediocrity and embrace their potential for greatness.Nietzsche’s concept of the "will to power" has had a profound impact on existentialism, psychology, and political thought. It resonates with those who seek to transcend societal constraints and create their own purpose in life. Critics argue that Nietzsche’s emphasis on power and self-assertion may lead to social hierarchies or justify oppression. However, proponents note that Nietzsche envisioned the "will to power" as a personal and creative force, not as a tool for tyranny. Some interpret the "will to power" as a metaphysical force underpinning all existence, while others view it more narrowly as a psychological drive specific to humans. Scholars like Walter Kaufmann (in Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist, Princeton University Press, 1950) emphasize its creative, life-affirming aspects rather than a simplistic lust for dominance.In J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings (first published in 1954 by George Allen & Unwin), the One Ring serves as a profound symbol of power's dual nature: it is both alluring and corrupting. This duality illustrates Tolkien’s nuanced view of power: its potential to both enslave and destroy when misused and its capacity to contribute to peace and justice when approached with wisdom, restraint, and selflessness.The One Ring is crafted by the Dark Lord Sauron to dominate the other Rings of Power and to enslave Middle-earth. Its immense power draws others to it, revealing their vulnerabilities and ambitions.The allure of the Ring demonstrates how power can intoxicate even the noblest individuals. Those who encounter it experience its seductive pull, exposing their inner desires for control, glory, or survival. Frodo describes its weight and psychological toll: “It’s mine, I tell you. My own. My precious. Yes, my precious.” (Frodo struggles with the Ring’s influence in The Fellowship of the Ring, Book I, Chapter 2).The longer someone holds the Ring, the more it corrupts them, eroding their morality and enslaving their will. Gollum, who possesses the Ring for centuries, becomes a tragic figure—a warped shadow of his former self. Even Gandalf and Galadriel, paragons of wisdom and virtue, fear the Ring’s potential to corrupt them should they claim it: “In place of the Dark Lord, you would set up a Queen. And I shall not be dark, but beautiful and terrible as the Morning and the Night! … All shall love me and despair!”Frodo Baggins symbolizes the selfless use of power. As the Ring-bearer, he resists its corruption longer than most, motivated by his commitment to destroy it for the greater good.In the wrong hands, power becomes a destructive force. Sauron’s use of the Ring illustrates how absolute power leads to domination and oppression. Characters like Boromir are tempted by the Ring’s promise to use its power for good, such as defending Gondor. Yet this rationalization illustrates how the desire for power can corrupt even noble intentions. Boromir ultimately succumbs to the Ring’s influence, attempting to take it from Frodo. Frodo’s journey reflects how humility, courage, and the willingness to relinquish power are necessary for its constructive use. Samwise Gamgee’s brief possession of the Ring showcases the strength of simple virtues like loyalty, love, and perseverance. Unlike others, Sam sees the Ring as a burden rather than an opportunity, demonstrating how unselfish intent can resist corruption.The ultimate destruction of the Ring—achieved by Frodo’s perseverance and Gollum’s fall—represents the triumph of selflessness and the rejection of absolute power. It restores peace to Middle-earth, demonstrating that power, when wielded responsibly or relinquished altogether, can lead to harmony.Tolkien emphasizes that power itself is not inherently evil. Rather, its effects depend on who wields it and their intentions. The Ring magnifies this paradox: while it grants incredible strength, it simultaneously enslaves its user. The story underscores the ethical responsibility of those in positions of power. Characters like Gandalf and Aragorn demonstrate that true strength lies in restraint and wisdom, not domination. Despite the Ring’s corrupting influence, Tolkien offers hope. Gollum’s role in destroying the Ring reflects the potential for even the most corrupted individuals to contribute to justice, however unintended their actions might be.The exploration of power in The Lord of the Rings continues to influence contemporary fantasy and political philosophy, inspiring discussions about the ethical use of authority. Some scholars interpret the Ring as a metaphor for the destructive technologies or ideologies of Tolkien’s time (e.g., the atomic bomb or totalitarian regimes). However, Tolkien denied direct allegory, describing the Ring as a more universal symbol of unchecked ambition and the moral perils of power (see J.R.R. Tolkien, The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, edited by Humphrey Carpenter. George Allen & Unwin, 1981).Scholars such as Tom Shippey (The Road to Middle-earth. HarperCollins, 2005) argue that the Ring’s dual nature illustrates Tolkien’s broader concern with the complexity of human motivations.The One Ring in J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings masterfully symbolizes the duality of power. It reveals how power, though alluring and potentially beneficial, can also corrupt and destroy when pursued selfishly or without restraint. By contrasting destructive ambition with selfless sacrifice, Tolkien highlights the beauty of balanced authority and the moral imperative to wield power wisely. The story’s enduring appeal lies in its exploration of these timeless themes.At its core, power often refers to the capacity to control or influence others' behaviour, resources, or outcomes. In 'Economy and Society' (translated by Keith Tribe, 2019, Harvard University Press) Max Weber defines power (Macht) as "the probability that one actor within a social relationship will be in a position to carry out his own will despite resistance." This perspective emphasizes power as coercive or dominating, particularly within societal and political structures. For example, a government enforcing laws even against dissenting individuals.In Leviathan (1997, Touchstone), Thomas Hobbes sees power as the ability to maintain order in society. For Hobbes, power is necessary to prevent the 'state of nature,' where life would be 'nasty, brutish, and short.' Here, power is the force behind authority and governance.In this view, power is about overcoming resistance and establishing control, often tied to political and institutional authority.Another perspective sees power not as domination but as the ability or potential to achieve goals. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle describes power as an enabler for human flourishing (eudaimonia). Power, in this sense, is an individual’s capacity to act virtuously and fulfill their potential. For example, a teacher using their knowledge to empower students reflects power as capability.In Development as Freedom, Amartya Sen sees power as the freedom to achieve desired outcomes. For Sen, power is the ability to lead a life one values, emphasizing the importance of enabling individuals rather than dominating them.This view frames power as the capacity to act, create, or bring about change in oneself or the world.Another perspective sees power not as domination but as the ability or potential to achieve goals. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle describes power as an enabler for human flourishing (eudaimonia). In this sense, power is an individual’s capacity to act virtuously and fulfil their potential. For example, a teacher using their knowledge to empower students reflects power as capability.In Development as Freedom (1997, Oxford University Press), Amartya Sen sees power as the freedom to achieve desired outcomes. For Sen, power is the ability to lead a life one values, emphasizing the importance of enabling individuals rather than dominating them.This view frames power as the capacity to act, create, or bring about change in oneself or the world.From post-modern thought, Power is also understood as relational, existing in interactions and negotiations between individuals or groups. In Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1995, Vintage Books, originally published in French as Surveiller et punir in 1975) and The History of Sexuality (Volume 1: An Introduction, translated from the French by Robert Hurley, 1978, Random House, Inc.), Michel Foucault argues that power is not merely something possessed but is exercised through relationships and structures. Power operates through knowledge, discourse, and institutions, shaping how people think and behave. The influence of social norms and language on individual behaviour is an example of relational power.Michel Foucault's Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison is a seminal work that explores the evolution of systems of punishment and the development of modern disciplinary mechanisms. Foucault examines how power operates in society, shifting from physical punishment to more subtle, psychological forms of control. Foucault contrasts pre-modern and modern systems of punishment to illustrate a broader transition in how power is exercised in society. In pre-modern societies, punishment was primarily public and physical, such as executions or torture. The goal was to demonstrate the authority of the sovereign by punishing offenders in a way that was visible and spectacular. For example, the opening of Discipline and Punish vividly describes the public execution of Robert-François Damiens in 1757, emphasizing the brutal nature of sovereign power.In modern societies, punishment becomes more hidden and psychological. The focus shifts to reforming individuals rather than physically harming them. Power operates through surveillance and normalization, creating self-discipline in individuals. Example: The prison system replaces public executions, emphasizing correction and control over spectacle.Foucault traces the emergence of the prison as the primary form of punishment in the 18th and 19th centuries. Prisons reflect broader societal changes where discipline extends beyond the penal system into schools, factories, and hospitals. The goal is to create "docile bodies" that are productive and obedient.Foucault adopts Jeremy Bentham's concept of the Panopticon, an architectural design for a prison where inmates can be constantly observed without knowing whether they are being watched. The Panopticon symbolizes how modern power functions through constant surveillance and internalized discipline. The threat of being watched leads individuals to regulate their behaviour, even when no one is watching.Foucault argues that discipline is a pervasive mechanism of power in modern societies, extending beyond prisons to other institutions. Discipline establishes norms and evaluates individuals based on how they conform to these norms. Those who deviate are categorized as abnormal, marginalizing them in society.Foucault links the evolution of punishment to broader shifts in how power operates in society. Power is not merely a tool of repression but also productive—it creates knowledge, norms, and categories of identity. The criminal justice system produces knowledge about "criminals" that defines what constitutes deviance.Power is diffused throughout society, embedded in institutions, practices, and relationships. It operates not just from above (e.g., by the state) but horizontally through networks of control. Foucault critiques the idea that modern systems of punishment are more "humane". While physical punishment has declined, modern disciplinary practices can be more invasive and dehumanizing because they target the mind and behaviour. The shift from public execution to the prison obscures the mechanisms of control, making them harder to challenge. Modern punishment serves not just to punish offenders but to maintain social order by producing compliant citizens.Foucault argues that modern society as a whole operates as a "disciplinary society" where surveillance, normalization, and control are pervasive. Institutions like schools, workplaces, and hospitals replicate the mechanisms of discipline found in prisons. Individuals internalize these controls, leading to self-discipline without overt coercion.Philosophers and religious thinkers often address the ethical dimensions of power, questioning its legitimacy and moral use. In On Liberty (2003, Yale University Press), John Stuart Mill highlights the dangers of "the tyranny of the majority," where power can oppress individuals. He advocates for limiting power to protect individual freedoms, stressing its moral dimensions.Philosophers and religious thinkers often address the ethical dimensions of power, questioning its legitimacy and moral use. In On Liberty (2003, Yale University Press), John Stuart Mill highlights the dangers of "the tyranny of the majority," where power can oppress individuals. He advocates for limiting power to protect individual freedoms, stressing its moral dimensions.Power carries moral implications, and its legitimacy depends on how it aligns with ethical principles and justice. The Qur'an and Prophetic teachings emphasize that power should be used responsibly and for the betterment of others. For instance, the Qur'an states,اِنَّ اللّٰهَ يَأْمُرُكُمْ اَنْ تُؤَدُّوا الْاَمٰنٰتِ اِلٰٓى اَهْلِهَاۙ وَاِذَا حَكَمْتُمْ بَيْنَ النَّاسِ اَنْ تَحْكُمُوْا بِالْعَدْلِ ۗ اِنَّ اللّٰهَ نِعِمَّا يَعِظُكُمْ بِهٖ ۗ اِنَّ اللّٰهَ كَانَ سَمِيْعًاۢ بَصِيْرًا“Indeed, Allāh commands you to render trusts to whom they are due and when you judge between people to judge with justice. Excellent is that which Allāh instructs you. Indeed, Allāh is ever Hearing and Seeing.” (Qur'an 4:58).This reflects power as a trust (amanah) that must align with justice and accountability.In Islamic thought, power is viewed as a trust (amanah) that must be exercised responsibly, emphasizing the establishment of justice (adl) and serving the public good (maslaha). If power is misused, it leads to oppression (zulm), which is categorically condemned in Islam.Leadership in Islam is a sacred responsibility to govern with fairness and uphold the rights of all individuals. Sunni scholars like Al-Mawardi (d. 1058 CE) in his work Al-Ahkam As-Sultaniyyah (The Ordinances of Government, 1989, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah) outline the duties of a ruler as Safeguarding religion, Administering justice and Protecting the weak and ensuring the welfare of society.The Prophet (ﷺ) warned about the burden of leadership, "Every one of you is a shepherd, and every one of you will be asked about his flock. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 893; Sahih Muslim, Hadith 1829). This highlights that power is not a privilege but a responsibility, and leaders are answerable to both the people and Allah."
[Fragment 1]
Bahasa
