Trade Barriers : What and Why? (1)

A tariff walks into a bar and orders a drink. The bartender looks at it skeptically and says,

"Sorry, we don’t serve tariffs here. You raise the price of everything!"

The tariff smirks and replies,

"Well, at least I protect the local beer industry!"

From the corner of the room, a free trade agreement shouts,

"Protect? Please! You’re just making everyone pay more for the same old drink!"

The bartender sighs and mutters under his breath, "Great... another trade war brewing."

In ancient times, when humans began to trade with one another, the exchange of goods and services occurred directly. Traders brought agricultural products, spices, and handcrafted items from one region to another. However, as civilisations developed and nations emerged, the need to regulate trade became increasingly important.

During the 16th and 17th centuries, many European countries began adopting mercantilism, an economic theory that emphasized the importance of accumulating wealth through trade. Nations like England and France implemented high tariffs on imported goods to protect their domestic industries. They believed that by limiting foreign goods entering their markets, they could foster local economic growth and create jobs.

Mercantilism is an economic theory that dominated European thought from the 16th to the 18th century. It is based on the belief that a nation's wealth and power are best served by increasing exports and accumulating precious metals like gold and silver. The term "mercantilism" comes from the Latin word mercari, meaning "to trade," reflecting the central importance of trade in this theory.

The term "mercantilism" originates from the English word "merchant," which means "trader." This reflects the central focus of mercantilism on trade as a means to enhance a nation's wealth. The concept emphasizes that a country's economic strength is best achieved through a favorable balance of trade, specifically by exporting more than it imports, thereby accumulating precious metals like gold and silver as a measure of wealth.

The word itself has roots in the Latin term mercari, which means "to trade" or "to barter," and is derived from merx, meaning "goods" or "merchandise." Although the principles of mercantilism were practiced by various nations from the 16th to the 18th centuries, the term was not formally used until it was introduced by Victor de Riqueti and Marquis de Mirabeau in 1763 and later popularized by Adam Smith in his work The Wealth of Nations in 1776. Initially, the term was employed by critics of the system, but it eventually became widely accepted among historians and economists to describe this economic doctrine. Mercantilism dominated European thought from the 16th to the 18th century.

Who Developed Mercantilism?

Mercantilism does not have a single founder but was shaped by various thinkers and policymakers over time. Key contributors include:

• Jean Bodin (France): A philosopher who emphasized the importance of money and taxation in economic policy.
• Thomas Mun (England): An influential merchant who advocated for a trade surplus as a means to national prosperity.
• Jean-Baptiste Colbert (France): The French Minister of Finance under King Louis XIV, who implemented mercantilist policies to strengthen France's economy.

Why Did Mercantilism Emerge?

Mercantilism arose during a period of significant social, political, and economic change in Europe, particularly during the Renaissance and the Age of Exploration. Several factors contributed to its emergence:

• Global Exploration and Colonization: European nations were exploring new territories, leading to increased access to resources and markets. Mercantilist policies helped countries control these resources and maximize their economic benefits.
• Rise of Nation-States: As centralized governments became more powerful, they sought ways to strengthen their economies and expand their influence. Mercantilism provided a framework for achieving this through state-controlled trade and commerce.
• Need for Precious Metals: Gold and silver were seen as the ultimate measure of wealth, so nations aimed to accumulate as much as possible through favorable trade balances (exporting more than importing).
• Economic Competition: European powers were in constant competition for dominance. Mercantilist policies—such as high tariffs on imports, subsidies for exports, and restrictions on colonial trade—were designed to give each nation an economic advantage.

Mercantilism operated on several key principles:

• Trade Surplus: Exporting more goods than importing to accumulate wealth.
• State Intervention: Governments played an active role in regulating the economy through tariffs, subsidies, and monopolies.
• Colonial Exploitation: Colonies provided raw materials to the mother country while serving as markets for finished goods.
• Protectionism: High tariffs were imposed on imports to protect domestic industries.

Mercantilism was an economic strategy aimed at strengthening nations by controlling trade and accumulating wealth. While it contributed to the rise of powerful European empires, it also led to exploitation, colonial domination, and conflicts over resources. The system eventually fell out of favor with the rise of free-market economics championed by thinkers like Adam Smith, but its legacy remains an important chapter in the history of economic thought.

As time passed, conflicts between these nations frequently arose due to differing trade policies. One of the most notable examples is the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act enacted in the United States in 1930. To protect farmers and local industries during the Great Depression, the U.S. government imposed high tariffs on thousands of imported goods. However, this move triggered retaliation from other countries, which also imposed tariffs on American products. As a result, international trade plummeted drastically, exacerbating the global economic crisis.

After World War II, the world began to recognize that trade barriers could devastate the global economy. Consequently, in 1947, member countries established the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) to promote trade liberalization and reduce these barriers. GATT laid the groundwork for many international trade agreements aimed at creating a more open global market.

Despite efforts to reduce trade barriers, various forms of trade restrictions remain prevalent today. Some countries still impose tariffs to protect local industries from foreign competition. Additionally, there are non-tariff barriers, such as stringent regulations regarding product quality and complicated import procedures.

In recent decades, we have witnessed a resurgence of protectionist policies in various parts of the world. For instance, the trade war between the United States and China that began in 2018 illustrates that trade barriers continue to be a powerful political tool in international relations.

The history of trade barriers reflects the complex dynamics of relationships between nations. From mercantilist policies in the 17th century to modern-day trade wars, barriers to trade have always been part of countries' economic strategies to protect their national interests. However, lessons from history show that excessive protectionism can harm all parties involved and hinder global economic growth.

Now, imagine a bustling global marketplace where countries exchange goods and services, each contributing something unique to the table. One country might export high-quality machinery, while another specializes in agricultural products. This seamless exchange of goods is what international trade is all about. However, not all trade flows freely. Sometimes, governments step in to regulate or restrict this flow, creating what we call trade barriers.

Trade barriers are like walls or hurdles placed on the path of international trade. These barriers can take many forms, from imposing taxes on imported goods to setting strict rules about the quality of products that can enter a country. For example, consider a small country with a growing steel industry. To protect its local steel manufacturers from being overwhelmed by cheaper imports from larger nations, the government might impose tariffs—a tax on imported steel. This makes foreign steel more expensive and gives local producers an edge in their domestic market.

The concept of tariffs has a long and storied history, deeply intertwined with the development of global trade and economic systems. The term "tariff" itself originates from the Arabic word تعرفة (ta'arifa), which means "notification" or "inventory," referring to a list or schedule of fees to be paid. Over time, it came to signify a tax or duty imposed on goods crossing national borders, either as imports or exports.

The use of tariffs can be traced back to ancient civilizations. For example, in ancient Egypt, taxes were levied on goods imported from foreign lands. Similarly, in the Roman Empire, customs duties were imposed on goods entering and leaving its territories. These early forms of tariffs were primarily used as a source of revenue for governments.

The modern concept of tariffs began to take shape during the Middle Ages. As trade expanded across Europe and Asia, rulers began imposing duties on goods transported through their territories. By the 14th and 15th centuries, tariffs became a tool for protecting domestic industries from foreign competition. Countries like England and France started using tariffs strategically to encourage local production and reduce reliance on imported goods.

Which country or nation first imposed tariffs?

It is difficult to pinpoint the exact origin of tariffs in their modern form, as many civilizations independently developed customs duties as part of their economic systems. However, England is often credited as one of the first nations to systematically implement tariffs for economic policy purposes. During the 17th century, England began imposing high tariffs on imported textiles to protect its burgeoning domestic textile industry. This marked the beginning of using tariffs not just for revenue generation but also as a tool for economic protectionism.

Over time, tariffs evolved from simple taxes into complex instruments of economic policy. By the 19th century, tariffs were widely used by industrialized nations to protect their industries and generate revenue. However, as global trade expanded in the 20th century, international efforts like the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) emerged to reduce tariff barriers and promote free trade.

Today, tariffs remain a contentious topic in global economics. While some countries use them to protect domestic industries or retaliate against unfair trade practices, others advocate for reducing tariffs to foster international cooperation and economic growth.

Tariffs have transitioned from being a basic revenue tool in ancient times to a sophisticated policy instrument in modern global trade—a reflection of humanity's evolving approach to commerce and governance.

But tariffs are just one type of trade barrier. Another common form is a quota, which limits the quantity of a specific product that can be imported. Imagine a country that wants to support its local dairy farmers. It might set a quota allowing only a certain amount of foreign milk to enter its market each year. By restricting supply, the government ensures that local farmers can compete without being undercut by cheaper imports.

The concept of quotas has a rich history that intertwines with human governance and resource management. The term "quota" is derived from the Latin phrase "quota pars," which translates to "how large (a part)" or "a proportional share." This etymology reflects the fundamental nature of quotas as mechanisms for distributing resources or systematically limiting quantities.

Quotas have been utilized since ancient times, particularly in contexts where resource allocation was necessary. In medieval Europe, for instance, rulers imposed quotas on towns to supply soldiers or materials for military campaigns. This practice ensured that each region contributed fairly to the collective needs of the state.

As societies evolved, so did the application of quotas. By the 19th century, quotas began to be implemented in more structured forms, particularly in economic and immigration policies. Governments recognized the need to regulate the flow of goods and people, leading to the establishment of formal quota systems.

While it is challenging to pinpoint a single country that first implemented quotas in their modern form, the United States is notable for establishing one of the earliest and most significant quota systems with its Immigration Act of 1921 and, later, the Immigration Act of 1924. These acts introduced national origin quotas, limiting immigration based on the demographic composition of the U.S. population as recorded in previous censuses.

The 1924 Act specifically reduced the annual quota for any nationality from 3% of their population in 1910 to 2% based on the 1890 census. This change favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe while significantly restricting those from Southern and Eastern Europe, reflecting contemporary racial and ethnic biases.

Over time, quotas have evolved beyond immigration controls. They have been applied in various sectors, including trade, education, and employment. For example:

• Trade Quotas: Countries use import/export quotas to manage trade balances and protect domestic industries from foreign competition.
• Affirmative Action: Quotas have also been employed in educational institutions and workplaces to ensure representation for marginalized groups.

The legacy of these early quota systems has shaped modern policies worldwide. While quotas can serve as tools for equitable distribution and representation, they also raise complex ethical questions about fairness and discrimination.

Quotas originated as a means of proportional distribution in ancient governance and have transformed into critical instruments for managing immigration, trade, and social equity in contemporary society. Their historical roots reflect humanity's ongoing struggle with resource allocation and societal balance.

When we think about tariffs, it’s essential to understand their impact from two perspectives: the country imposing the tariffs and the country facing them.

For the Country Imposing Tariffs

Let’s start with the advantages. One of the most significant benefits is revenue generation. Tariffs provide governments with an additional source of income, which can be vital for funding public services or reducing budget deficits. Additionally, tariffs serve as a protective barrier for domestic industries. By raising the prices of imported goods, they encourage consumers to buy locally produced items, thus supporting homegrown businesses and preserving jobs.

Moreover, tariffs can be a powerful tool for political leverage. They allow countries to exert pressure on trading partners, influence negotiations, or address concerns about unfair trade practices. Lastly, tariffs can contribute to market stability by making prices more predictable and reducing reliance on volatile international trade.

However, there are notable disadvantages as well. One major drawback is that consumers end up paying higher prices for imported goods, which can disproportionately affect lower-income households. Furthermore, while protecting domestic industries might seem beneficial, it can lead to reduced efficiency and innovation due to less competition in the market.

Tariffs can also spark trade wars. When one country imposes tariffs, it often provokes retaliatory measures from others, leading to escalating tensions that harm global trade. Additionally, tariffs may create regional inequities within a country, benefiting certain industries or areas while disadvantaging others.

For the Country Facing Tariffs

Now, let’s explore the perspective of the country that is subject to tariffs. On the positive side, facing tariffs might open doors for negotiations. It can provide an opportunity for diplomatic discussions aimed at resolving trade disputes or improving relations.

Moreover, countries affected by tariffs may be incentivized to diversify their markets or industries. This could lead to a more resilient economy in the long run as they seek alternatives to reduce dependency on any single trading partner.

However, the disadvantages are significant. One of the most pressing issues is reduced export demand. Higher prices due to tariffs make goods less competitive in the importing country, leading to decreased sales and economic losses for exporters. Additionally, countries facing tariffs often find themselves in a cycle of retaliation; they may impose their own tariffs in response, which can further complicate trade relationships and reduce access to foreign markets.

For developing countries in particular, tariffs can hinder their ability to integrate into global markets, stunting economic growth and development opportunities. Lastly, relying on trade with tariff-imposing nations can disrupt supply chains and production processes, affecting businesses and workers alike.

So, while tariffs can offer protection and revenue for the imposing country, they often lead to higher consumer prices and inefficiencies. For countries facing these tariffs, the consequences include reduced competitiveness and potential economic retaliation. Ultimately, both sides risk escalating tensions that could undermine global trade and economic stability as a whole.

In the following episode, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Quotas and other types of trade barriers.

[Episode 2]

[Bahasa]