Raja Ampat: Paradise Loved, Paradise Lost (3)

Why do environmental problems exist? At the heart of this question lies a tangled web of human behaviour, ideology, and power. One major reason is the dominance of economic systems that prioritise endless growth over ecological balance. Capitalism, especially in its late-stage, thrives on the exploitation of nature as a resource to be extracted, commodified, and consumed. This mindset sees forests as timber, rivers as waste channels, and the Earth itself as an infinite warehouse for human desires.

Another reason is disconnection—many people have grown distant from the natural world, living in urban environments where nature feels like something “out there” rather than something we’re part of. Cultural narratives have long promoted human supremacy over nature, reinforcing the belief that it’s ours to dominate. Political inaction, corporate greed, and weak environmental regulation further fuel this crisis.

But there’s also a deeper philosophical reason: the idea that humans stand above and apart from nature, rather than within it. This illusion of separation has led to choices that favour short-term gain over long-term survival. In truth, the “why” of environmental destruction reflects not only flawed systems, but also flawed worldviews. Healing the Earth will require us to question not just what we do, but how we think.

When we ask “Where do environmental issues occur?”, the truthful answer is: everywhere. Environmental degradation knows no borders. It happens in the Amazon rainforest when trees are felled for cattle grazing; it unfolds in the Arctic where melting ice signals climate collapse; it manifests in cities where polluted air chokes residents; and it thrives in the oceans where plastic and oil spills suffocate marine life. However, it is also essential to note that while environmental harm is global, it is not distributed equally. The Global South, home to some of the planet’s richest ecosystems, often suffers the worst consequences of pollution, extraction, and climate change—despite contributing the least to the problem. Meanwhile, industrialised nations have historically outsourced their environmental burdens to poorer countries through trade, waste dumping, and resource extraction. “Where” also includes our own homes, supermarkets, fashion choices, and mobile phones—all seemingly ordinary places and objects tied to complex environmental chains. In truth, the environment is not “out there”; it is all around us.

When we ask “Who is responsible for the environment?”, the answer is layered and complex. It is not just one group or profession, but a collective of actors, ranging from governments and multinational corporations to local communities, farmers, scientists, activists, and everyday individuals. Policymakers wield immense influence by shaping environmental laws and regulations, while corporations often hold the power to either degrade or protect ecosystems through their business practices. Yet, grassroots movements, indigenous peoples, and environmental defenders play a crucial role in resisting exploitation and preserving biodiversity. Scientists and educators contribute by raising awareness and offering sustainable solutions, whereas consumers, through their daily choices, reinforce either harmful or regenerative systems. Ultimately, responsibility is shared, though not equally. Those with the most power and resources bear the greatest burden, while those most affected—often the poor and marginalised—are frequently the least to blame.

How can we address environmental issues? The answers are as layered and complex as the problems themselves. It begins with recognising that environmental repair is not merely a scientific or technical challenge—it is a moral, cultural, and political undertaking. Practically, it requires a shift away from extractive economies towards regenerative ones: systems that replenish what they use, that value circularity over waste, and that centre ecological well-being rather than corporate profit.

This means investing in renewable energy, rethinking agriculture, rewilding landscapes, protecting biodiversity, and embracing sustainable living not as a trend, but as a norm. However, it also means dismantling the systems that cause harm: fossil fuel dependency, deforestation, exploitative mining, and the unchecked power of industries that pollute with impunity.

But deeper than policy, the “how” must also reach the heart. We need new stories—narratives that reimagine our relationship with the Earth not as masters, but as caretakers. Change happens when people care, and people care when they feel connected. Education, art, local activism, indigenous wisdom, and youth movements all have powerful roles to play in awakening this connection. In the end, “how” is not only about tools and technologies—it’s about values, vision, and courage.

What is happening in Raja Ampat is not simply a localised environmental mishap—it is a textbook example of how paradise can be compromised by short-sighted decisions. Once praised as one of the most biodiverse marine ecosystems on Earth, a true underwater Eden, Raja Ampat is now facing mounting ecological stress. This includes coral reef damage, illegal fishing, pollution from tourism, and most controversially, extractive mining operations that were greenlit under the pretext of “development.”

Who is responsible? It's a tangled web. Local communities have long lived in harmony with the environment, but decisions made by powerful state actors, corporate interests, and investors—often far removed from the islands themselves—have triggered many of the recent ecological disturbances. These decisions were often made without proper consultation or consent from indigenous Papuan communities, turning them into spectators in their own ancestral waters.

Where this is unfolding is a region so ecologically sacred that Jacques Cousteau once called it one of the last underwater Edens. Raja Ampat is situated off the coast of West Papua, Indonesia, and has long been a crown jewel in marine conservation circles. Yet, ironically, it's precisely this ecological richness that has made it a target for exploitation—from mass tourism to mining permits.

When did things start to turn? Although environmental concerns have existed for years, a turning point came in the late 2010s when mining concessions were granted by the government, notably in 2017. These licences opened the floodgates for land clearing, forest degradation, and subsequent threats to both terrestrial and marine life. The timeline coincides with increased tourism campaigns that, while economically beneficial, brought with them a wave of ecological strain.

Why is this happening? At its core, it reflects a systemic tension between economic growth and environmental preservation. Governments and corporations often chase GDP figures, job creation, or “development” narratives, ignoring the long-term cost to ecosystems and the people who depend on them. It is a clash of value systems: one that sees nature as capital to be mined, and another that sees it as sacred and interconnected.

How can we respond? By demanding transparency, empowering indigenous communities, and rejecting the false choice between prosperity and preservation. Sustainable tourism, stricter environmental regulations, and a return to indigenous ecological wisdom offer viable paths forward. But perhaps most importantly, it requires us to change the dominant narrative—from one of domination over nature to one of reverence and responsibility.

Environmental degradation is not merely an accidental by-product of modern progress—it is the result of a long-standing disconnection between humans and nature, fuelled by systems that prioritise profit over planetary health. Through our exploration of the “what”, “who”, “where”, “when”, “why”, and “how” of environmental issues, we’ve uncovered a complex web where science meets politics, economics clashes with ethics, and cultural narratives shape the way we see and treat the Earth.

Solving these problems requires more than eco-friendly apps or greenwashing campaigns. It calls for a profound cultural and systemic shift—a reimagining of humanity’s place in the web of life. Whether inspired by Fritjof Capra’s systems thinking, Rachel Carson’s ecological warnings, James Lovelock’s Gaia hypothesis, or Vandana Shiva’s fight for indigenous knowledge and justice, the message is clear: healing the Earth is not just a technical challenge; it is a cultural revolution. And that revolution begins in the stories we tell, the values we uphold, and the courage we muster to choose a different path.

[Part 1]

[Part 2]

Bahasa